嗯,是的,这种方法是值得尝试的。</blockquote></div><div class="ce-block ce-block--focused" data-id="vbwX9VL8uK" >
<div class="ce-block__content">
<div class="ce-paragraph cdx-block ce-paragraph--left">不过还有个问题就是不能套的太多,比如浮亏达到多少时认为被套住了,或者多少手数,这个是一定要有的,我有时候还是这样搞的,先锁着部分,再重新下单,</div>
</div>
</div><style type="text/css">
.ce-block {
margin-bottom: 20px;
}
.ce-block__content,.ce-toolbar__content {
/* max-width:calc(100% - 50px) */
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
.ce-paragraph {
line-height: 1.6em;
outline: none;
text-indent: 2em;
font-size: 16px;
}
.ce-paragraph--right {
text-align: right;
}
.ce-paragraph--center {
text-align: center;
}
.ce-paragraph--left {
text-align: left;
}
.ce-paragraph--justify {
text-align: justify;
}
.ce-paragraph-text-indent {
text-align: justify;
}
.ce-paragraph:empty::before{
content: attr(data-placeholder);
color: #707684;
font-weight: normal;
opacity: 0;
}
/** Show placeholder at the first paragraph if Editor is empty */
.codex-editor--empty .ce-block:first-child .ce-paragraph:empty::before {
opacity: 1;
}
.codex-editor--toolbox-opened .ce-block:first-child .ce-paragraph:empty::before,
.codex-editor--empty .ce-block:first-child .ce-paragraph:empty:focus::before {
opacity: 0;
}
.ce-paragraph p:first-of-type{
margin-top: 0;
}
.ce-paragraph p:last-of-type{
margin-bottom: 0;
}
.svg-icon {
width: 1em;
height: 1em;
}
.svg-icon path,
.svg-icon polygon,
.svg-icon rect {
fill: #4691f6;
}
.svg-icon circle {
stroke: #4691f6;
stroke-width: 1;
}
</style><style type="text/css">
.inline-code {
background: rgba(250, 239, 240, 0.78);
color: #b44437;
padding: 3px 4px;
border-radius: 5px;
margin: 0 1px;
font-family: inherit;
font-size: 0.86em;
font-weight: 500;
letter-spacing: 0.3px;
}
</style> 是否锁仓,还是不锁仓直接另开单?
如果不锁的话,浮亏岂非还是越来越大? 有可行性,就是新开始的一轮订单,在什么情况下开单是个问题,是继续原订单的方向做,还是反向做,这个要ea做出来后再来研究了。 用均线指标,金叉只开多,死叉只开空单,可以有效避开大单边,剩下就是解决形态快速反转时候的套牢单了。
页:
1
[2]